Browsing by Author "Ndinya, C."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Barriers and Facilitators in Preparation and Consumption of African Indigenous Vegetables: A Qualitative Exploration from Kenya(Frontiers, 2022-03-21) Merchant, E.V.; Odendo, M.; Ndinya, C.; Nyabinda, N.; Maiyo, N.; Downs, S.; Hoffman, D.J.; Simon, J.E.; Rutgers University ; Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization - Kakamega ; Academic Model Providing Access to HealthCare ; Rutgers School of Public HealthMalnutrition and food security continue to be major concerns in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). In Western Kenya, it is estimated that the double burden of malnutrition impacts 19% of adults and 13–17% of households. One potential solution to help address the concern is increased consumption of nutrient-dense African Indigenous Vegetables (AIVs). The objectives of this study were to: (i) document current methods used for preparation and consumption of AIVs; (ii) identify barriers and facilitators of AIVs consumption and preparation; and (iii) identify a package of interventions to increase the consumption of AIVs to promote healthy diets. This study used qualitative data collected from 145 individual farmers (78 female and 67 male) in 14 focus group discussions (FGDs) using a semi-structured survey instrument. Most farmers reported that they prepared AIVs using the traditional method of boiling and/or pan-cooking with oil, tomato, and onion. However, there were large discrepancies between reported cooking times, with some as little as 1–5 min and others as long as 2 h. This is of importance as longer cooking times may decrease the overall nutritional quality of the final dish. In addition, there were seasonal differences in the reported barriers and facilitators relative to the preparation and consumption of AIVs implying that the barriers are situational and could be modified through context-specific interventions delivered seasonally to help mitigate such barriers. Key barriers were lack of availability and limited affordability, due to an increase cost, of AIVs during the dry season, poor taste and monotonous diets, and perceived negative health outcomes (e.g., ulcers, skin rashes). Key facilitators included availability and affordability during peak-season and particularly when self-produced, ease of preparation, and beneficial health attributes (e.g., build blood, contains vitamins and minerals). To promote healthy diets within at risk-populations in Western Kenya, the findings suggest several interventions to promote the preparation and consumption of AIVs. These include improved household production to subsequently improve affordability and availability of AIVs, improved cooking methods and recipes that excite the family members to consume these dishes with AIVs, and the promotion of the beneficial heath attributes of AIVs while actively dispelling any perceived negative health consequences of their consumption.Item Does Intervention in African Indigenous Vegetables Value Chain Improve Production and Welfare Outcomes? Evidence from Western Kenya(Journal of Agriculture Science & Technology, 2023) Odendo, M.; Ndinya, C.; Onyango, E.; Wanyama, J.; Akollo, S.; Makete, N.; Kweyu, S.; Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization (KALRO) Kakamega & Kitale ; Anglican Development Services (ADS) ; AGROKenyaAfrican Indigenous Vegetables (AIVs) are increasingly recognized as essential for sustainable dietary diversification in the predominantly cereal based staple diets. The AIVs also provide employment opportunities and generate income for the rural populations. Many initiatives by researchers and development agencies have promoted the AIVs value chains in Kenya. However, little evidence exists on impact of the initiatives on farm households. Several studies have examined impact of agricultural interventions based on observational data. The findings from such studies are likely to be influenced by unobserved attributes, resulting in a biased estimation of causal relationships between interventions and impacts. We conducted a cluster- randomized controlled trial to estimate the unbiased impacts of a multifaceted intervention that focused on production, consumption nutrition behavior change communication, and linking farmers to markets in selected AIV value chains (cowpea, spider plant, amaranth, nightshade, and slender leaf) in western Kenya. Using two waves of household panel data (2018 and 2021), we evaluated the impacts of the intervention on land area allocation to AIVs, total leaf production, AIVs income, and household dietary diversity Score (HDDS). The empirical estimation using descriptive statistics and analysis of covariance revealed that households that were exposed to the intervention significantly increased land area under AIVs by 38% (p < 0.01) and total leaf production by 46% (p < 0.05). At end line, the spider plant had the highest percentage increase (60%) in land area compared to the control group. However, there is no evidence of whether or not the intervention had an impact on AIVs income and HDDS. The study concludes that the hypothesis that the intervention was to have significant impact on AIV production, nutrition security and income had mixed results. We recommend that similar interventions include components to integrate the capacity of households to adapt to risks such as the COVID-19 pandemic and climate change. Further cost-benefit analysis is required for informed resource allocation. Designing and implementing policies that promote household access to input and output markets are likely to improve the performance of the AIV value chains and contribute to income and nutrition.
