Browsing by Author "Umina, P. A.,"
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Global Crop Impacts, Yield Losses, and Action Thresholds for Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)(Elsevier Ltd., 2021) Overton, K.; Maino, J. L.; Day, R.; Umina, P. A.,; Bett, B.; Carnovale, D.; Ekesi, S.; Meagher, R.; Reynolds, O. L.; Cesar Australia 293 Royal Parade ; CABI ; , The University of Melbourn ; Plant Health Australia ; International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ; Insect Behavior and Biocontrol Unit USDA-ARS CMAVE ; Graham Centre for Agricultural InnovationThe fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a highly polyphagous plant pest that can severely impact yields of several agricultural crops. Understanding the economic impact and management thresholds for FAW across a variety of crop commodities is crucial for effective management. Evaluating the peer-reviewed and grey literature, we compiled global data on: (1) yield losses reported as a result of FAW infestations, (2) the relationship between FAW pressure/density and reported yield loss, and (3) current known economic injury levels, economic thresholds and action thresholds. We identified 71 references that reported yield losses from FAW infestation, with a total of 888 separate yield loss entries. The majority of research quantifying yield losses and the relationship between pest pressure and yield has focused on maize, sorghum, and cotton, with some evidence for sweet corn, bermudagrass, and rice. Yield loss varied between management strategies, with genetically modified and/or insecticide treated crops typically retaining higher yields. Most studies investigating the relationship between FAW density and yield loss across different crops have focused on early and mid FAW larval instars and on vegetative through to reproductive plant growth stages, with minimal research on both late larval instars and on plant seedlings. Economic thresholds were not reported in the literature. The reporting of economic injury levels and action thresholds varied significantly both between and within crops, highlighting the need for a standardised approach when measuring FAW pressures or densities that elicit management responses.
