The Visual Responsiveness of the Tsetse Fly, Glossina Morsitans to Moving Objects: The Effects of Hunger, Sex, Host Odour and Stimulus Characteristics.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

1972

Authors

Brady, J.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

The responses of adult Glossina morsitans Westw. to large slowly moving visual stimuli were tested in the laboratory. The standard stimulus, lasting 60 s, consisted of a vertical black stripe (5° wide) on a white background moved 12 times past a window (25° wide) at 13·5°/s. The kinetic responses (take-off), but not orientation towards the stripe, went through a daily cycle with morning and evening maxima some 500% greater than the mid-day response. Kinetic responsiveness in both sexes and all ages of fly increased in an overall linear manner during five days' starvation, though pregnant females were about half as responsive as mature males. The intensity of orientation also increased with starvation, at least in males. For take-off, the minimum stripe width eliciting responses subtended ca 0·6° to the flies, and the optimum angular velocity was 3–7°/s, for orientation, 2–20°/s; the distance of the stripe appeared unimportant. Human odour elicited take-offs in the absence of the visual stimulus, and enhanced the visual responses if these were tested within three minutes of the start of odour stimulation; these effects were much greater in teneral than in mature males. It is concluded that the differences between the sexes and physiological stages of fly are mainly quantitative, and that the accepted view of four physiologically distinguishable phases of behaviour is therefore unsatisfactory. Instead, it is proposed that tsetse behaviour is the outcome of continuously variable responsiveness to visual host stimuli, and not a succession of behavioural entities.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Brady, J. (1972). The visual responsiveness of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans Westw. (Glossinidae) to moving objects: the effects of hunger, sex, host odour and stimulus characteristics. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 62(2), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300047714

Collections