Sensory Evaluation of Quality Protein Maize in Kenya

dc.bibliographicCitation.endpage255en
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue4en
dc.bibliographicCitation.stpage251en
dc.bibliographicCitation.titleEast African Agricultural And Forestry Journalen
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume78en
dc.contributor.authorOuma, J.O.
dc.contributor.author De Groote, H.
dc.contributor.authorGunaratna, N.S.
dc.contributor.institutionKenya Agricultural Research Institute
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-12T10:18:05Z
dc.date.available2015-08-12T10:18:05Z
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.description.abstractThe paper analyses sensory attributes and acceptability of KH631Q and WSQI04, Quality Protein Maize varieties (QPM) and H513 and Embu Composite (EMCO) conventional varieties in the preparation of local food, githeri. KH631Q and H513 are commercial hybrids, while WSQI04 and EMCO are Open Pollinated Varieties (OPVs). The evaluations were conducted in November and December 2007 in one rural and two urban communities in Embu district, Eastern Kenya. 131 participants evaluated samples of each of the four treatments that were presented in randomized order, generated through a balanced design. The samples were evaluated on a Likert scale of I (very poor) to 5 (very good) on three attributes namely appearance, taste and texture. Overall score of the samples was also done. Ordinal regression model was used to analyse the data. There were differences (P<0.05) in the sensory attributes of the samples. Samples of WSQ 1 04 were more preferred to H513, the control. There were no differences in preferences between men and women. Similarly, preferences for the samples did not vary by age. Appearance, taste, and texture were all important in determining the overall evaluation. The study suggests that evaluation by an expert panel to explore more detailed criteria be done. It further suggests that conventional varieties should be compared with their QPM converted counterpart where possible to isolate the effect of QPM.en
dc.description.notesKenya Agricultural Research Institute, P.O.Box 27-60100, Embu, Kenya.en
dc.identifier.citationOuma, J., De Groote, H., & Gunaratna, N. (2012). Sensory evaluation of quality protein maize in Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 78, 113-118.en
dc.identifier.issn0012-8325*
dc.identifier.urihttps://kalroerepository.kalro.org/handle/0/9282
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en
dc.subject.agrovocAcceptabilityen
dc.subject.agrovocanalysisen
dc.subject.agrovocProtein malnutritionen
dc.subject.agrovocEvaluationen
dc.subject.agrovocDataen
dc.titleSensory Evaluation of Quality Protein Maize in Kenyaen
dc.typeJournal Contribution*
dc.type.refereedRefereeden
dc.type.specifiedArticleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY VOL 78 NO 3& 4 2012 Split 15.pdf
Size:
960.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections