Evaluation of Selection Strategies in Dual-Purpose and Specialized Breeding of Indigenous Chicken

dc.contributor.authorMiyumo, S.
dc.contributor.authorWasike, C.B.
dc.contributor.authorIlatsia, E.D.
dc.contributor.authorBennewitz, J.
dc.contributor.authorChagunda, M.G.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Hohenheim ; Maseno University ; Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization ; University of Hohenheim
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-30T12:23:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-30T12:23:56Z
dc.date.issued2024-08
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate various selection strategies for adoption in dual-purpose (ICD), meat (ICM) and layer (ICL) breeding goals in indigenous chicken breeding programs. The ICM goal aimed to improve live weight (LW12), daily gain (ADG) and egg weight (EW12) or together with feed efficiency and antibody response. For the ICL goal, age at first egg (AFE) and egg number (EN12) or together with feed efficiency and antibody response were targeted. In the ICD goal, the objective was to improve LW12, ADG, AFE and EN12 or together with feed efficiency and antibody response. Highest total index responses of US$ 49.83, US$ 65.71, and US$ 37.90 were estimated in indices targeting only production traits in the ICD, ICM and ICL goals, respectively. Highest index accuracy estimates of 0.77 and 0.70 were observed in indices that considered production and feed-related traits in the ICD and ICL goals, respectively, while in the ICM goal, the highest estimate of 0.96 was observed in an index targeting only production traits. Inbreeding levels ranged from 0.60 to 1.14% across the various indices considered in the breeding goals. Targeting only production traits in the ICD, ICM and ICL goals required the least number of generations of selection of 7.46, 5.50, and 8.52, respectively, to achieve predefined gains. Generally, a strategy targeting only production traits in a goal was the most optimal but resulted to unfavorable correlated responses in feed efficiency and antibody response. Addition of feed efficiency or/and antibody response in a goal was, however, not attractive due to the decline in total index response and accuracy and increase in inbreeding levels and number of generations of selection. Considering the feed availability and disease challenges in the tropics, choice of including feed efficiency or/and antibody response in the ICD, ICM and ICL goals should depend on targeted production system, resource availability to support breeding activities and magnitude of correlated responses on these traits when not included in the goals.
dc.description.sponsorshipEUROPEAN UNION
dc.identifier.citationMiyumo, S., Wasike, C.B., Ilatsia, E.D., Bennewitz, J., & Chagunda, M.G. (2024). Evaluation of Selection Strategies in Dual-Purpose and Specialized Breeding of Indigenous Chicken. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103916
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.103916
dc.identifier.urihttps://kalroerepository.kalro.org/handle/123456789/14047
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectindigenous chicken
dc.subjectselection strategy
dc.subjectdual-purpose breed
dc.subjectspecialized breed
dc.titleEvaluation of Selection Strategies in Dual-Purpose and Specialized Breeding of Indigenous Chicken
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0032579124004954-main-1-2.pdf
Size:
176.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: